Horton

Re: Big 7.1 open items

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>, "Bruce Momjian" <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>, "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
Date: 2000-06-17T16:11:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> However it seems very natural to take multi_tables_per_file
> smgr into account when we consider TABLESPACE concept.
> Because TABLESPACE is an encapsulation,it should have
> a possibility to handle multi_tables_per_file smgr IMHO.

OK, I see: you're just saying that the tablespace stuff should be
designed in such a way that it would work with a non-file-per-table
smgr.  Agreed, that'd be a good check of a clean design, and someday
we might need it...

			regards, tom lane