Re: dblink memory leak

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-10-05T19:41:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No big hurry, I think, considering the leak has always been there.

> Great. It seems like this is too invasive a change to backport. My
> feeling is that not enough people have complained about this specific
> scenario to warrant the risk.

Agreed, the risk/reward ratio doesn't seem favorable for a backport.

			regards, tom lane