Re: SO_KEEPALIVE
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-05-16T16:40:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org> writes: > How come we don't set SO_KEEPALIVE in libpq? > Is there any reason why we wouldn't want it on? Is there any reason we *would* want it on? The server-side keepalive should be sufficient to get whatever useful impact it might have. regards, tom lane