Re: SO_KEEPALIVE

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-05-16T16:40:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org> writes:
> How come we don't set SO_KEEPALIVE in libpq? 
> Is there any reason why we wouldn't want it on?

Is there any reason we *would* want it on?  The server-side keepalive
should be sufficient to get whatever useful impact it might have.

			regards, tom lane