Re: BUG #18016: REINDEX TABLE failure
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>, richard.vesely@softea.sk,
pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-07-09T14:18:30Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > That should be OK, I assume. However, if this is improved and > something we want to support in the long-run I guess that a TAP test > may be appropriate. I do not see the point of a TAP test. It's not like the code isn't covered perfectly well. regards, tom lane
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Reindex toast before its main relation in reindex_relation()
- f2bf8fb04886 17.0 landed
-
Fix comment in index.c
- bd5760df38c0 17.0 landed
-
Clean up a bug in sql/json items commit 66ea94e8e6
- 06a66d87dbc7 17.0 cited
-
Create a "relation mapping" infrastructure to support changing the relfilenodes
- b9b8831ad60f 9.0.0 cited