Re: BUG #18016: REINDEX TABLE failure

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>, richard.vesely@softea.sk, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-07-09T14:18:30Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> That should be OK, I assume.  However, if this is improved and
> something we want to support in the long-run I guess that a TAP test
> may be appropriate.

I do not see the point of a TAP test.  It's not like the code isn't
covered perfectly well.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Reindex toast before its main relation in reindex_relation()

  2. Fix comment in index.c

  3. Clean up a bug in sql/json items commit 66ea94e8e6

  4. Create a "relation mapping" infrastructure to support changing the relfilenodes