Re: WAL file location
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-07-30T20:17:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > Having said all that, I still believe that this is something tailor-made for > postgresql.conf. Well, exactly. Regardless of how serious you may think the security argument is, it still remains that a config-file entry seems the ideal way to do it. I can't see any good argument in favor of relying on environment variables instead. They don't bring any new functionality to the party; and we have an awful lot of work invested in putting all sorts of functionality into the GUC module. I think that doing configuration-like stuff outside the GUC framework is now something that we should resist --- or at least have a darn good reason for it when we do it. regards, tom lane