Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql@rkirkpat.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-ports@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-12-21T17:56:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > if (sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(Oid) && cvt > UINT_MAX) Hm. Each part of that will generate "expression is always false" warnings from certain overprotective compilers. A more serious problem is that using UINT_MAX assumes that Oid is unsigned int, which will certainly not be true forever --- but the required change will be easily missed when Oid changes. Perhaps postgres_ext.h could define #define OID_MAX UINT_MAX right below the typedef for Oid, and then we could do this in oidin(): #if OID_MAX < ULONG_MAX if (cvt > OID_MAX) elog(); #endif I think this #if expression will work --- anyone see any portability risk there? regards, tom lane