Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql@rkirkpat.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-ports@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-12-21T17:56:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>         if (sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(Oid) && cvt > UINT_MAX)

Hm.  Each part of that will generate "expression is always false"
warnings from certain overprotective compilers.  A more serious problem
is that using UINT_MAX assumes that Oid is unsigned int, which will
certainly not be true forever --- but the required change will be easily
missed when Oid changes.

Perhaps postgres_ext.h could define

	#define OID_MAX  UINT_MAX

right below the typedef for Oid, and then we could do this in oidin():

	#if OID_MAX < ULONG_MAX
		if (cvt > OID_MAX)
			elog();
	#endif

I think this #if expression will work --- anyone see any portability
risk there?

			regards, tom lane