Re: Logical to physical page mapping
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-10-27T13:43:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes: > The reason why we need full_page_writes is that we need to guard against > torn pages or partial writes. So what if smgr would manage a mapping > between logical page numbers and their physical location in the relation? > At the moment where we today require a full page write into WAL, we > would mark the buffer as "needs relocation". The smgr would then write > this page into another physical location whenever it is time to write it > (via the background writer, hopefully). After that page is flushed, it > would update the page location pointer, or whatever we want to call it. > A thus free'd physical page location can be reused, once the location > pointer has been flushed to disk. This is a critical ordering of writes. > First the page at the new location, second the pointer to the current > location. Doing so would make write(2) appear atomic to us, which is > exactly what we need for crash recovery. I think you're just moving the atomic-write problem from the data pages to wherever you keep these pointers. regards, tom lane