Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-03-01T21:51:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue mar 01 12:00:08 -0300 2012: >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I confess I am nervous about ripping this out. I am pretty sure we >> will get complaints about it. Performance optimizations that benefit >> group A at the expense of group B are always iffy, and I'm not sure >> the case of using an array as a path indicator is as uncommon as you >> seem to think. > Maybe we should keep it as an option. How would we make it optional? There's noplace I can think of to stick such a knob ... regards, tom lane