Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-10-17T21:51:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com> writes:
> Okay, so the rule is:

> * If there is no .abi-compliance-history file, baseline from the latest tag
> * Otherwise, baseline from the first SHA to appear in the file

NO.  The rule is: if there's no such file, do not apply ABI checking.
We are not interested in ABI complaints against master.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Add commit 24f6c1bd4 to v17 .abi-compliance-history.

  2. Add .abi-compliance-history to back-branches.

  3. Add reminder to create .abi-compliance-history.

  4. Update .abi-compliance-history file.

  5. Add .abi-compliance-history to v18 branch.

  6. Fix thinko in commit 7d129ba54.

  7. Fix lookups in pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats().

  8. Add defenses against unexpected changes in the NodeTag enum list.