Re: Review for GetWALAvailability()

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>

From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-06-25T03:34:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/06/25 3:27, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Thanks for those corrections.
> 
> I have pushed this.  I think all problems Masao-san reported have been
> dealt with, so we're done here.

Sorry for my late to reply here...

Thanks for committing the patch and improving the feature!

	/*
	 * Find the oldest extant segment file. We get 1 until checkpoint removes
	 * the first WAL segment file since startup, which causes the status being
	 * wrong under certain abnormal conditions but that doesn't actually harm.
	 */
	oldestSeg = XLogGetLastRemovedSegno() + 1;

I see the point of the above comment, but this can cause wal_status to be
changed from "lost" to "unreserved" after the server restart. Isn't this
really confusing? At least it seems better to document that behavior.

Or if we *can ensure* that the slot with invalidated_at set always means
"lost" slot, we can judge that wal_status is "lost" without using fragile
XLogGetLastRemovedSegno(). Thought?

Or XLogGetLastRemovedSegno() should be fixed so that it returns valid
value even after the restart?

Regards,


-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



Commits

  1. Persist slot invalidation correctly

  2. Adjust max_slot_wal_keep_size behavior per review

  3. Save slot's restart_lsn when invalidated due to size

  4. Fix issues in invalidation of obsolete replication slots.