Re: I just got it: PostgreSQL Application Server -- a
Mark Woodward <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>
From: pgsql@mohawksoft.com
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql@mohawksoft.com, "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal@mailblocks.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-06-14T11:40:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> >>The "PostgreSQL Enhanced Server" (How's that name? Maybe we call it >> Zerver >>and use PEZ?) idea is how to take the excellent core of PostgreSQL and >>productize it in much the same way distributions take the Linux kernel >> and >>may a GNU/Linux system. >> >> >> > It would seem to me that this is more correct in the commercial space. > Of course I am biased but > what you are talking about sounds a whole lot like RedHat Enterprise > versus Fedora etc.... No, I don't think I agree. It does not need to be "Commercial" as it is similar to Apache Jacarta too. If you are going to do a complex project with PostgreSQL, you sort of have a lot of construction ahead of you. Yea, it is a great SQL engine, but to build a high speed web site, or virtually any complex project, you will need a lot of add-ons. Rather than have everyone duplate the effort of finding the extensions, why not have a project with all this stuff installed. AFAIK, and correct me if I'm wrong, having functions installed doesn't affect performance.