Re: dblink_build_sql_update versus dropped columns

Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I didn't even think people were using those functions for many years
> since I never heard any complaints. I'd say better to not backpatch
> changes to logical ordering, but FWIW the attached at least fixes the
> immediate bug in head and ought to work at least a few branches.

[squint...]  This doesn't appear to me to fix the problem.  You really
need the query-construction loops to track logical and physical numbers
separately.

			regards, tom lane