Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-12-09T18:31:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Patch 1 fixed the problems on frogmouth.

Cool, thanks.  I'll push that in a bit (to the back branches as well as
HEAD).

> Patch 2 also ran without incident.

What do people think about the second patch?  I'd only propose that
for HEAD, since it's not really a bug fix.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Use only one thread to handle incoming signals on Windows.

  2. Fix race condition in our Windows signal emulation.