Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Martín Marqués <martin@2ndquadrant.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Date: 2019-03-29T12:33:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3/29/19 11:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2019-03-20 14:42, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> But that would be factually incorrect and backwards, so it seems like a >> terrible idea, at least when it comes to manual. If you are doing it >> manually, it's a lot *easier* to do it right with the non-exclusive >> mode, because you can easily keep one psql and one shell open. And >> that's safe. > > The scenario I have in mind is, a poorly maintained server, nothing > installed, can't install anything (no internet connection, license > expired), flaky network, you fear it's going to fail soon, you need to > take a backup. The simplest procedure would appear to be: start backup > mode, copy files away, stop backup mode. Anything else that involves > holding a session open over there for the whole time is way more fragile > unless proper preparations have been made (and even then). So I don't > know what you want to call that scenario, but I would feel more > comfortable having these basic tools available in a bind. I would argue the best thing in this scenario is to use pg_basebackup. It's a solid tool and likely far better than any script the user might cook up on the spot. Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
Commits
-
Warn more strongly about the dangers of exclusive backup mode.
- c900c15269f0 12.0 landed