Re: pg_upgrade bugs
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-09-03T04:00:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Maybe, to reduce future backpatching pain, we could backpatch the change > to exec_prog() API now that you have fixed the implementation? I'm inclined to think this is a good idea, but keep in mind we're less than four days from wrapping 9.2.0. There's not a lot of margin for error here. At the same time, getting pg_upgrade to pass regression on Windows would be a good thing, and ought to go a long way towards ameliorating worries about this. regards, tom lane
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pg_upgrade: Fix exec_prog API to be less flaky
- 088c065ce8e4 9.3.0 cited