Re: pg_upgrade bugs

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-09-03T04:00:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Maybe, to reduce future backpatching pain, we could backpatch the change
> to exec_prog() API now that you have fixed the implementation?

I'm inclined to think this is a good idea, but keep in mind we're less
than four days from wrapping 9.2.0.  There's not a lot of margin for
error here.

At the same time, getting pg_upgrade to pass regression on Windows would
be a good thing, and ought to go a long way towards ameliorating worries
about this.

			regards, tom lane


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. pg_upgrade: Fix exec_prog API to be less flaky