more C99 cleanup
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-21T13:50:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- 0001-Replace-internal-C-function-pg_hypot-by-standard-hyp.patch (text/plain) patch 0001
- 0002-Update-comment-related-to-C99.patch (text/plain) patch 0002
- 0003-Fix-pg_isblank.patch (text/plain) patch 0003
- 0004-Remove-obsolete-comment.patch (text/plain) patch 0004
I have been hunting down the last few pieces of code that made some obsolete claims about not being able to use C99 yet or needing to be compatible with pre-C99 or something like that. I found two obsolete comments and two places where we could now actually use the C99 functionality that the comment was anticipating. At least according to my grepping, all the remaining mentions of "C99" are now up to date and relevant.
Commits
-
Update comment related to C99
- 376c649634bb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix pg_isblank()
- 8b3e2c622a85 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Replace internal C function pg_hypot() by standard hypot()
- 8fe4aef8297b 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove obsolete comment
- c581c9a7ac2a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Report timezone offset in pg_dump/pg_dumpall
- ad5d46a4494b 9.5.0 cited