Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser

On 2024-02-22 Th 15:29, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 1:38 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> Patch 5 in this series fixes those issues and
>> adjusts most of the tests to add some trailing junk to the pieces of
>> json, so we can be sure that this is done right.
> This fixes the test failure for me, thanks! I've attached my current
> mesonification diff, which just adds test_json_parser to the suite. It
> relies on the PATH that's set up, which appears to include the build
> directory for both VPATH builds and Meson.



OK, thanks, will add this in the next version.


>
> Are there plans to fill out the test suite more? Since we should be
> able to control all the initial conditions, it'd be good to get fairly
> comprehensive coverage of the new code.



Well, it's tested (as we know) by the backup manifest tests. During 
development, I tested by making the regular parser use the 
non-recursive  parser (see FORCE_JSON_PSTACK). That doesn't test the 
incremental piece of it, but it does check that the rest of it is doing 
the right thing. We could probably extend the incremental test by making 
it output a stream of tokens and making sure that was correct.


> As an aside, I find the behavior of need_escapes=false to be
> completely counterintuitive. I know the previous code did this, but it
> seems like the opposite of "provides unescaped strings" should be
> "provides raw strings", not "all strings are now NULL".


Yes, we could possibly call it "need_strings"  or something like that.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com