Re: Add tests for object size limits of injection points
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-12T02:35:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On Nov 10, 2025, at 18:27, Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Michael, Chao, > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 11:32 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:30:31AM +0800, Chao Li wrote: >>> Is really confused. The error message says “maximum of 64”, but the >>> test right uses a name of length 64. I know that the tricky is the >>> ‘\0’ terminator, but should SQL writer have to keep mind about the >>> ‘\0’ terminator? Should they just consider maximum length as 63? >> >> Right. We could add a "- 1" to the error message printed. > > Thanks for the patch. I also agree with Chao's suggestion that the > error message better reflects the actual character limits. I > implemented a patch for that and updated the test patch as well. > Please check. > > Best, > Xuneng > <v2-0001-injection_points-Report-actual-character-limits-i.patch><v2-0002-injection_points-Add-tests-for-name-limits.patch> The patch looks good to me. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
Commits
-
injection_points: Add tests for name limits
- fb9bff045421 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Report better object limits in error messages for injection points
- f30cd34b3fd0 17.8 landed
- 84e826567cb8 18.2 landed
- 6e1535308c84 19 (unreleased) landed