Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-10-18T14:28:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> writes: > On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 22:20, Tom Lane wrote: >> Simple: respond to 'em all with a one-line answer: "convince us why we >> should use it". The burden of proof always seems to fall on the wrong >> end in these discussions. > ... Now, it seems, that > people don't want to answer questions at all as it's bothering the > developers. Not at all. But rehashing issues that have been talked out repeatedly is starting to bug some of us ;-). Perhaps the correct "standard answer" is more like "this has been discussed before, please read the list archives". regards, tom lane