Re: Postgresql and multithreading

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-10-18T14:28:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 22:20, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Simple: respond to 'em all with a one-line answer: "convince us why we
>> should use it".  The burden of proof always seems to fall on the wrong
>> end in these discussions.

> ... Now, it seems, that
> people don't want to answer questions at all as it's bothering the
> developers.

Not at all.  But rehashing issues that have been talked out repeatedly
is starting to bug some of us ;-).  Perhaps the correct "standard
answer" is more like "this has been discussed before, please read the
list archives".

			regards, tom lane