Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>,
Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-10-04T03:54:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:18 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> ... One more thing: maybe we should rethink where to put >> extraUpdatedCols. Between the facts that it's not used for >> actual permissions checks, and that it's calculated by the >> rewriter not parser, it doesn't seem like it really belongs >> in RelPermissionInfo. Should we keep it in RangeTblEntry? >> Should it go somewhere else entirely? I'm just speculating, >> but now is a good time to think about it. > I've kept extraUpdatedCols in RangeTblEntry in the latest patch, but > perhaps it makes sense to put that into Query? That's got morally the same problem as keeping it in RangeTblEntry: those are structures that are built by the parser. Hacking on them later isn't terribly clean. I wonder if it could make sense to postpone calculation of the extraUpdatedCols out of the rewriter and into the planner, with the idea that it ends up $someplace in the finished plan tree but isn't part of the original parsetree. A different aspect of this is that putting it in Query doesn't make a lot of sense unless there is only one version of the bitmap per Query. In simple UPDATEs that would be true, but I think that inherited/partitioned UPDATEs would need one per result relation, which is likely the reason it got dumped in RangeTblEntry to begin with. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Add a test case for a316a3bc
- 054ff3b33a85 17.0 landed
- 0a14bca662a4 16.0 landed
-
Correctly set userid of subquery relations' child rels
- a316a3bc6d3f 16.0 landed
-
Fix buggy recursion in flatten_rtes_walker().
- c7468c73f7b6 16.0 landed
-
Remove some dead code in selfuncs.c
- 438e6b724090 16.0 landed
-
Update outdated comment in ApplyRetrieveRule
- 29861e228a47 16.0 landed
-
Rework query relation permission checking
- a61b1f74823c 16.0 landed
-
Generalize ri_RootToPartitionMap to use for non-partition children
- fb958b5da86d 16.0 landed
-
Stop accessing checkAsUser via RTE in some cases
- 599b33b9492d 16.0 landed
-
Add 'missing_ok' argument to build_attrmap_by_name
- ad86d159b6ab 16.0 landed