Horton

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>, "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2008-01-28T04:22:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes:
>> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
>>> I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
>>> "synchronized_seqscans"?

> Would it make sense to match the plural as well?

Actually, the best suggestion I've seen so far is Guillaume's
"synchronize_seqscans" --- make it a verb phrase.

			regards, tom lane