Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption
Shawn Wang <shawn.wang@highgo.ca>
From: Shawn Wang <shawn.wang@highgo.ca>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, "Antonin Houska" <ah@cybertec.at>, "Ants Aasma" <ants.aasma@eesti.ee>
Date: 2019-09-04T09:23:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
---- On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:56:15 +0800 Alvaro Herrera <mailto:alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote ---- On 2019-Aug-02, Shawn Wang wrote: > Hi Antonin, > It is very glad to see the new patch. I used the public patches a long time ago. > I did some tests like the stream replication, much data running, temporary files encryption. > I found that there is an issue in the src/backend/storage/file/encryption.c. You should put block_size = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_block_size(ctx); under the #ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING. > There is some problem to merge your patches to the latest kernel in the pg_ctl.c. Is a new, fixed version going to be posted soon? It's been a while. Also, apologies if this has been asked before, but: how does this patch relate to the stuff being discussed in https://postgr.es/m/031401d3f41d$5c70ed90$1552c8b0$@lab.ntt.co.jp ? Hi Álvaro, Thank you for a reply. I mainly said that the issues in the src/backend/storage/file/encryption.c. If somebody want to use these patches, I think Antonin need to fix it. It does not relate to the stuff being discussed in TDE. As I know, some company use these patches to encrypt data, even if these issues don't matter. Regards, -- Shawn Wang
Commits
-
Dramatically reduce System V shared memory consumption.
- b0fc0df9364d 9.3.0 cited