Horton

Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>

View thread
From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, "girgen@freebsd.org" <girgen@freebsd.org>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "robertmhaas@gmail.com" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "ftigeot@wolfpond.org" <ftigeot@wolfpond.org>, Tom Sparks <tgs@norse-corp.com>
Date: 2014-04-27T01:25:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Add shared_memory_type GUC.

JFYI we have 3 or 4 machines racked for the pgsql project in our DC. 

Tom informed me he would be lighting them up this week time permitting.  

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 26, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> 
> Jim,
> 
> * Jim Nasby (jim@nasby.net) wrote:
>>> On 4/22/14, 5:01 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>> We also have colo space and power, etc.  So this would be the whole deal.  The cluster would be up for as long as needed.
>>> 
>>> Are the machine specs sufficient?  Any other things we should look for?
>>> 
>>> CC'd Tom on this email.
>> 
>> Did anyone respond to this off-list?
> 
> Yes, I did follow-up with Tom.  I'll do so again, as the discussion had
> died down.
> 
>> Would these machines be more useful as dedicated performance test servers for the community or generic BenchFarm members?
> 
> I don't believe they would be terribly useful as buildfarm systems; we
> could set up similar systems with VMs to just run the regression tests.
> Where I see these systems being particularly valuable would be as the
> start of our performance farm, and perhaps one of the systems as a PG
> infrastructure server.
> 
>    Thanks!
> 
>        Stephen