Re: Bad news for Open Source databases, acording to survey
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Marco Colombo <marco@esi.it>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-07-10T23:28:19Z
Lists: pgsql-general
Marco Colombo <marco@esi.it> writes: > "Open source database companies will not be able to compete with the price, > performance, maturity, and functionality of the commercial vendors" > price? A *free* product not being able to compete with the *price* of > a commercial one? I suppose he's talking about the open-source support companies, like RedHat, Great Bridge, PostgreSQL Inc, etc, who are hoping to sell you support and consulting services at a very definitely nonzero price. (Still a lot less than an Oracle license, though.) The long-term viability of that business model remains to be proven. But what this argument fails to realize is that the open-source project will still go on, even if all those companies go broke. Postgres has never depended for its existence on any particular company, and I certainly hope that it never will. I concur with the general opinion that this article is mostly hot air... regards, tom lane