Horton

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>, "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2008-01-28T02:04:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
[ redirecting thread to -hackers ]

Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 21:54 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself.

> I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
> "synchronized_seqscans"?

We have enable_seqscan already, so that last choice seems to fit in.

			regards, tom lane