Re: autonomous transactions
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com>, "Roberts,
Jon" <Jon.Roberts@asurion.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2008-01-22T19:53:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Agreed. I think Pavel Stehule was doing some experiments with them, I > don't know if he got anywhere. > I did only first research. Any hack is possible - you can stack current transaction, but real implementation needs similar work like nested transaction :( and it is too low level for me. And some code cleaning is necessary. There are global variables. And there is most important question about data visibility - is autonomous transaction independent on main transaction (isolation)? You have to thing about deadlock, about reference integrity, etc. This task isn't simple. Pavel > -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate >