Horton

Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: "Dimitri Fontaine" <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>, "David Fetter" <david@fetter.org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Asko Oja" <ascoja@gmail.com>, "Martin Pihlak" <martin.pihlak@gmail.com>
Date: 2008-08-18T09:05:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
2008/8/18 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 18 août 2008, Andrew Dunstan a écrit :
>> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:40:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> This is not the kind of patch we put into stable branches.
>>
>> So what? That is not the only criterion for backpatching.
>
> I fail to understand why this problem is not qualified as a bug.
>

Does it change of result some queries? It is protection to server's hang?

> Regards,
> --
> dim
>