Re: BLOBs
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Swan <tswan@olemiss.edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-06-12T23:02:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Swan <tswan@olemiss.edu> writes:
> I think I missed what I was trying to say in my original statement. I
> think there's a way to use the existing API with performance benefits
> left intact.
> Take for example the table :
> create table foo {
> foo_id serial,
> foo_name varchar(32),
> foo_object BLOB,
> );
> On the insert statement "insert into foo (foo_name,foo_object) values
> ('My Object','{some escaped arbitrary string of binary data}');", flush
> the {some escaped arbitrary string of binary data} to disk as a
> temporary file. Then do the lo_import operation transparent to the user.
> On a select, do the same thing (transparently) and return the data back
> to user.
> Personally, I like LO's being stored separately from the actual table.
I still think you've rediscovered TOAST. How is this better than (or
even significantly different from) foo_object being a toastable bytea
column?
regards, tom lane