Re: xlog location arithmetic
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-03-09T17:18:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 15:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Why would it be useful to use pg_size_pretty on xlog locations? >> -1 because of the large expense of bigint->numeric->whatever conversion >> that would be added to existing uses. > Given the expense, perhaps we need to different (overloaded) functions instead? That would be a workable solution, but I continue to not believe that this is useful enough to be worth the trouble. regards, tom lane