Re: ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE WITH
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-12-14T18:54:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > There are various applications where we want to completely replace the > contents of a table with new/re-calculated data. > It seems fairly obvious to be able to do this like... > 1. Prepare new data into "new_table" and build indexes > 2. Swap old for new > BEGIN; > DROP TABLE "old_table"; > ALTER TABLE "new_table" RENAME to "old_table"; > COMMIT; Why not BEGIN; TRUNCATE TABLE; ... load new data ... COMMIT; > What I propose is to write a function/command to allow this to be > explicitly achievable by the server. > ALTER TABLE "old_table" > REPLACE WITH "new_table"; I don't think the cost/benefit ratio of this is anywhere near as good as you seem to think (ie, you're both underestimating the work involved and overstating the benefit). I'm also noticing a lack of specification as to trigger behavior, foreign keys, etc. The apparent intention to disregard FKs entirely is particularly distressing, regards, tom lane