Horton

Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-22T03:10:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Discussion seems to have ended on this thread without a clear direction.

I still think the right thing is to just use a non-default port number.
That gets 90% of the benefit for 10% of the work of any other approach
(except for the ones for which the ratio is even worse).

			regards, tom lane