Re: pl/pgsql enabled by default

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-05-09T04:00:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Hm. If you incorrectly mark your function as IMMUTABLE even though it
> has side effects then the planner may indeed collapse this. Does the
> planner know it can't collapse views if the underlying tables aren't
> accessible to the user?

There are no cases where function or view collapsing elides permissions
checks (if you have a counterexample please provide it!!).  They could
change the time at which permissions checks are applied, though; which
has the potential for a REVOKE to not disallow execution of already-
planned queries that ideally it should prevent.  I believe that this
risk will be fixed by the planned forcing of replanning after schema
changes.

			regards, tom lane