Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-08-01T15:54:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I don't think this can be claimed to be a corner case. If you set up >> an FTS index according to the first alternative offered in >> >> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/textsearch-tables.html#TEXTSEARCH-TABLES-INDEX >> >> you will find that the system fails to collect stats for it and so you >> get stupid default estimates for your FTS queries. > Yeah, maybe you're right. But I'd still prefer to see us break the > ABI and do this just in 9.0 rather than changing 8.4. OK, I can live with that. I'll take a look at it shortly. regards, tom lane