Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions)

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Anyway, the lack of daily Cygwin builds is not permanent.

> There are several supported platforms not represented on the buildfarm - 
> e.g. the one HPUX member has never actually reported any results.

Yeah, and this is not a good thing.  Eventually I'd like to get to a
point where every platform we consider "supported" has regular buildfarm
reports.  No more calls for port reports during beta periods --- beta
work should focus on functionality testing, not getting it to build.

			regards, tom lane