Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes:
> So, may be we just move insertcleanup call to   ginbulkdelete/ginvacuumcleanup 
> but leave aminsertcleanup field in pg_proc for a future.

I'd be inclined not to add the extra AM call if we aren't going to use
it now.  There's no very good reason to think that a definition we
settled on today would be exactly the right thing for whatever future
need might appear.  Better to wait till we have a concrete example to
design around.

			regards, tom lane