Re: pgsql: Define INADDR_NONE on Solaris when it's missing.

mha@postgresql.org (Magnus Hagander) writes:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Define INADDR_NONE on Solaris when it's missing. Per a couple of buildfarm
> members complaining.

This seems likely to break as much as it fixes, since there's no very
good reason to assume that whatever header should define INADDR_NONE
has been included before the os.h header file has been read.

Possibly more to the point, where are we using INADDR_NONE anyway?

			regards, tom lane