Horton

Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-06-06T16:33:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tom, for example, has previously not wanted to even bump
> catversion after beta1, which rules out a huge variety of
> possible fixes and interface changes.  If we want to make a
> policy decision to change our approach, we should be up-front
> about that.

What?!?  There have been catversion bumps between the REL?_?_BETA1
tag and the REL?_?_0 tag for 8.2, 8.3, 9.0, 9.1, 9.3, and 9.4.
(That is, it has happend on 6 of the last 8 releases.)  I don't
think we're talking about any policy change here.  We try to avoid
a catversion bump after beta if we can; we're not that reluctant to
do so if needed.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Add Valgrind buffer access instrumentation.

  2. Fix wrong merge resolution making pg_receivexlog fail in 9.2.