Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Can someone explain why configure/platform-specific flags are allowed to
> be added at this stage in the release, but my pgmonitor patch was
> rejected?

Possibly just because Marc hasn't stomped on me quite yet ;-)

However, I can actually make a case for this: we are flushing out
performance bugs in a new feature, ie WAL.

			regards, tom lane