Re: Proposal for Updating CRC32C with AVX-512 Algorithm.
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Amonson, Paul D" <paul.d.amonson@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
"pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org"
<pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
"Shankaran,
Akash" <akash.shankaran@intel.com>
Date: 2024-06-12T18:08:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Compute CRC32C using AVX-512 instructions where available
- 3c6e8c123896 18.0 landed
"Amonson, Paul D" <paul.d.amonson@intel.com> writes: > I had our OSS internal team, who are experts in OSS licensing, review possible conflicts between the PostgreSQL license and the BSD-Clause 3-like license for the CRC32C AVX-512 code, and they found no issues. Therefore, including the new license into the PostgreSQL codebase should be acceptable. Maybe you should get some actual lawyers to answer this type of question. The Chromium license this code cites is 3-clause-BSD style, which is NOT compatible: the "advertising" clause is significant. In any case, writing copyright notices that are pointers to external web pages is not how it's done around here. We generally operate on the assumption that the Postgres source code will outlive any specific web site. Dead links to incidental material might be okay, but legally relevant stuff not so much. regards, tom lane