Re: LLVM / clang
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: "P. Caillaud" <peufeu@peufeu.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-10T13:52:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Quick testing shows that clang doesn't get through the configure stage > on this Debian system -- it looks like some amount of better integration > with glibc might be needed. Building with llvm-gcc works fine, but I > understand that using llvm-gcc with native code generation isn't all > that different from using gcc itself, so that's not a surprising result. > The only issue is that the float8 regression test fails, so it is > apparently not *exactly* the same. There's a buildfarm animal using llvm-gcc, and it passes just fine ... so the float8 failure sounds to me like another integration problem. regards, tom lane