Re: UPSERT
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>, "Jonathan Scher" <js@oxado.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-03-02T18:19:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Seems like we should try to locate a row first, then INSERT if we cannot > find one. That's slower on INSERT but more balanced overall Except it still has the race condition. > I'm a bit surprised the TODO didn't mention the MERGE statement, which > is the SQL:2003 syntax for specifying this as an atomic statement. I believe we concluded that MERGE doesn't actually do quite what people want/expect. Please go back and read the archives. regards, tom lane