Re: Small fixes needed by high-availability tools
Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com>,
Ants Aasma <ants.aasma@cybertec.at>,
Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-05-14T18:13:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On 14 May 2025, at 05:33, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It might not necessarily be a flag—it could be some LSN value instead. >> Also, it's not just about a "new transaction," but about any new >> snapshot that could see data not yet replicated to the synchronous >> standby. >> > > Sounds reasonable to me. Let us see what others think about it. I think this LSN is simply LSN where crash recovery ends... Best regards, Andrey Borodin.