Re: Negative value of numGroups
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2022-05-17T15:34:17Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> writes: > On 13/5/2022 11:56, Andrey Lepikhov wrote: >> (long) Min(numGroups, (double) LONG_MAX); >> >> can return negative value, if numGroups > LONG_MAX. I see your point, but I don't think that repeating the same finicky and undocumented coding pattern in multiple places is a future-proof fix. I'm inclined to think we should invent a function along the lines of "long clamp_double_to_long(double x)". Given where it's used, maybe putting it beside clamp_row_est() would be good. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Avoid overflow hazard when clamping group counts to "long int".
- a916cb9d5a89 15.0 landed