Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
Palle Girgensohn <girgen@freebsd.org>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@wolfpond.org>
Date: 2014-04-21T15:58:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add shared_memory_type GUC.
- f1bebef60ec8 12.0 landed
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2014-04-21 11:45:49 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> That seems to make more sense. I can't imagine why this would be a runtime >> parameter as opposed to build time. > Because that implies that packagers and porters need to make that > decision. If it's a GUC people can benchmark it and decide. As against that, the packager would be more likely to get it right (or even to know that there's an issue). regards, tom lane