Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and

"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> writes:
> I guess I know (at least part) of what you mean. This is because we rely on 
> replay all the xlog no matter it belongs to a committed transaction or not. 
> Why? Because a failed transaction is not totally useless since later 
> transaction may reply on some physical thing it creates - for example, a new 
> page and its links of a btree. So for heap, there is(95% sure) no such 
> problem.

Torn pages (partial page write) are still a problem.

			regards, tom lane