Horton

Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-26T13:55:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I recall seeing "bus error" on sparc with other patches because of
> alignment issues, so I wonder if this is what's happening here.

Try compiling with the address sanitizer enabled.  Per c.h,

 * Testing can be done with "-fsanitize=alignment -fsanitize-trap=alignment"
 * on clang, or "-fsanitize=alignment -fno-sanitize-recover=alignment" on gcc.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. BRIN minmax-multi indexes

  2. BRIN bloom indexes

  3. Support the old signature of BRIN consistent function

  4. Remove unnecessary pg_amproc BRIN minmax entries

  5. Optimize allocations in bringetbitmap

  6. Move IS [NOT] NULL handling from BRIN support functions

  7. Pass all scan keys to BRIN consistent function at once

  8. Properly detoast data in brin_form_tuple