Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>,
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-08-25T18:33:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a small cache of locks owned by a resource owner in ResourceOwner.
- eeb6f37d89fc 9.3.0 cited
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2015-08-25 14:12:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> How would they have done that without major code surgery? We don't have >> any hooks or function pointers involved in the users of resowner.h. >> Certainly locks would not be getting passed to a nonstandard resowner. > CurrentResourceOwner = myresowner; > /* do some op */ Yeah, but so what? GrantLockLocal does not contain any way that external code could change the way that a new lock is recorded. (IOW, yeah, certainly third-party code could create a new *instance* of the ResourceOwner data structure, but they would not have any knowledge of what's inside unless they had hacked the core code.) regards, tom lane