Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-01-30T05:55:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > Linux.conf.au Report > [ much snipped ] > * IPV6 data types > - Apparently there are some ISPs in some countries that have started to bill > people for IPV6 bandwidth, and the lack of IPV6 address types is hurting > them. Yeah. This is a pretty self-contained problem, it just needs someone who's motivated to work on it. Mostly what we need is to understand how we want to extend the previously-agreed-to I/O behaviors for IPv4 inet and cidr types into the v6 domain. (Or should we back up and ask if the inet/cidr division still makes sense in the v6 world? I hope so, but if not we should face up to it...) > ... Maybe we should > chase some people for case studies? U betcha ... we were just getting pestered for more of those ... regards, tom lane