Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-01-30T05:55:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> Linux.conf.au Report
> [ much snipped ]

> * IPV6 data types
> - Apparently there are some ISPs in some countries that have started to bill
> people for IPV6 bandwidth, and the lack of IPV6 address types is hurting
> them.

Yeah.  This is a pretty self-contained problem, it just needs someone
who's motivated to work on it.  Mostly what we need is to understand how
we want to extend the previously-agreed-to I/O behaviors for IPv4 inet
and cidr types into the v6 domain.  (Or should we back up and ask if the
inet/cidr division still makes sense in the v6 world?  I hope so, but
if not we should face up to it...)

> ...  Maybe we should
> chase some people for case studies?

U betcha ... we were just getting pestered for more of those ...

			regards, tom lane