Re: pgsql: Define INADDR_NONE on Solaris when it's missing.

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 16:46, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Possibly more to the point, where are we using INADDR_NONE anyway?

> In the RADIUS code.

Oh, that's why it isn't in my tree and has zero portability track record ...

I think what this shows is we should look for a way to avoid using
INADDR_NONE.  What's your grounds for believing it's portable at all?
In the Single Unix Spec I only see INADDR_ANY and INADDR_BROADCAST
defined.

			regards, tom lane