Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc

snpe <snpe@snpe.co.yu> writes:
> I'm use 'autocommit=false' and have problem with psql
> When any commnad is lost, then next commnad get error for transactions
> (simple select command).BTW

> snpe> select * from org_ba;
> ERROR: relation org_ba does not exists
> snpe> select * from org_ban;
> ERROR: current transactions is aborted, queries ignored until end of 
> transaction block

Um, what's wrong with that?

It seems to me that an application that is using autocommit=off will
expect the first SELECT to start a transaction block.  If the first
SELECT fails, then subsequent commands *should* fail until you commit
or rollback.  Certainly if you did an explicit BEGIN before the first
SELECT, the above is what you'd get --- why should implicit BEGIN
work differently?

			regards, tom lane